Johnson-Weld is Not Just a Protest Vote

One undeniable fact is that a large portion of both Democrats and Republicans are more than dissatisfied with their party's nominee. This has left many of the faithful on both sides scratching their heads, wondering what they should do this November. "Should I sat home? Should I vote for a third party? Should I just write in the candidate I voted for in the primary?"

Short of an organized write-in campaign, most write-in votes are simply a record of protest. The same could be said for many third party votes. Third party candidates are generally crack pots, like Vermin Supreme, who want to mandate oral hygiene and give away free ponies to every American, or think tank gurus who are often unknown and have never held elected office. Few voters will vote for a third party candidate with any expectation that he could get elected or actually govern.

Fortunately, the Libertarian Party has offered up a ticket this year that could actually be taken seriously. Unlike the Reform Party of the past, which was nothing more than a vehicle for Ross Perot's cult of personality, the Libertarian Party has been around since 1971, founded on the principles of limited government, non-interventionism, and laissez-faire economics.  Current nominee, Gary Johnson, describes the party as being socially liberal and fiscally conservative. (Personally I find that description a bit simplistic and not entirely accurate, but it does convey some semblance of truth.)

The ticket of Gary Johnson and William Weld is not the perfect ideal of Libertarian purity, but they do offer a real, viable alternative to both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Johnson is the former two term governor of New Mexico and Weld is the former two term governor of Massachusetts. Both served as Republican governors of Democratic states where they governed conservatively, yet were solidly re-elected.  They enjoyed high popularity and were both considered successful governors. Governors Johnson and Weld each bring more public sector executive experience than both Trump and Clinton combined.  When is the last time a third party candidate could say that about the Democrats and Republicans?

Of course, the Libertarian Party has some loons. One of their candidates for chairman stripped off his clothes at the most recent national convention. But every party has their embarrassments. After all, the GOP nominated Donald Trump, a candidate who buys into conspiracy theories such as blaming Bush for 9/11 and accusing Ted Cruz's father of being involved in the JFK assassination. What I do suggest is that you look at the actual candidate himself. Look at Gary Johnson's record as governor. (And I would suggest looking at the actual record of Trump and Clinton too).

As a successful two term governor, Johnson can point to some significant accomplishments:

-Left office with New Mexico as one of the only four states in the country with a balanced budget

-Left New Mexico with a budget surplus

-Used Line Item Veto thousands of times to trim the budget

-Vetoed 750 bills during his time in office; more than all other governors combined

-Cut over 1,200 government jobs without firing anyone

-Created more than 20,000 new jobs

-First New Mexico Governor to challenge education status quo and propose statewide voucher program

-Restored State General Fund reserves to more than $222 million from a low of $28.1 million

-Limited annual state budget growth to 5.0% during eight years in office

-Cut taxes 14 times while never raising them—a first for New Mexico

-Vetoed 32% of the total number of bills submitted for his signature

That is a record any candidate would be proud to run on and would stand up well to anything Trump or Clinton can point to.

Another good reason to support this ticket is that it will get us to actually ask the impertinent questions that need to be asked. For example, what does the Department of Education actually do and why do we even have it? Some will throw up their hands and suggest that we can not touch this sacred cow. "Education is so important that of course we need a Department of Education!" But just slapping a label on something to make it sound important doesn't necessarily make it a good idea. Is there really any doubt that the "Affordable Care Act" has actually made health insurance LESS affordable? It is time for the government to stop coasting. A Libertarian presidency will force politicians to really evaluate the true public value of government institutions and program. We need to start asking if these are redundant, serve the public good, or even if there is a better and more efficient way to serve the original purpose. 

Of course there are issues on which I disagree with Johnson. Abortion and religious liberty are two issues where the Libertarian ticket and I are at odds. But I do not expect that I will agree with any candidate 100% of the time. On those issues, I see the courts as having more to say about them than I do any piece of legislation. 

I heartily endorse the ticket of Gary Johnson and William Weld for President of the United States. This is a ticket that brings the gravitas one would expect from a Presidential candidacy. I encourage everyone to consider their record and to respond favorably in polls so that they can get in in the debates. Gary Johnson would make a much better President than either Trump or Clinton. Let's see if we can shock the world.

Why I Have Been a Republican and Why I am Now #NeverTrump

I have always been interested in politics, even from a very young age. I can’t really say what it is that drew me in. Maybe it was the energy and excitement I saw on television during the conventions. Maybe it was all the pretty campaign buttons and lawn signs. Maybe it was the educational videos from Schoolhouse Rock. I honestly don’t know what drew me in, but I was fascinated.

My real coming of age was in the 1980’s. I remember what life was like in the late 1970’s under Democrat leadership. The country was a terrible mess. In fact, as I got older and heard Democrat politicians describe the economy as “the worst since the Great Depression”, I just had to shake my head. Did the 1970’s somehow disappear from history?

There was a terrible malaise that overshadowed the country. Inflation was at 13.5%. Interest rates were at 20%. (To give you an idea of what this meant, think of your credit card interest at 35%). Gross Domestic Product was declining at a rate of 0.03%. Unemployment was at 7.2% (not including those who gave up looking for work). People had to wait in line to purchase gasoline. Gas lines could stretch for a mile or more. Across the globe, American’s were being held hostage in Iran, as a third world radical thumbed his nose at the United States. People were living in fear of an aggressive Soviet Union, wondering if war was inevitable. To say things were terrible is an understatement.

The election of 1980 was the first time I really paid attention to the election. I really didn’t understand much, at the age of 12, but I knew something had to change. I didn’t really understand everything, but I heard some things from Governor Ronald Reagan that did stick with me. “Government is not the solution to our problems. Government IS the problem.” The concept that government should be limited was an idea that has stuck with me from the days of Reagan to today.

Here are some other great quotes from Reagan that express that idea so well:

“The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help you.”

“Government doesn’t solve problems. It subsidizes them.”

“The problem is not that the people are taxed too little. The problem is that the government spends too much.”

“Man is not free unless government is limited.”

(Here are some great Reagan speeches that express his character and his policies)

Reagan asked the American people in his one debate with Carter, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” The American people obviously believed that they were not and Reagan was swept into office, carrying 44 out of 50 states plus DC. It was an overwhelming landslide and a mandate for his conservative approach to government. His record in office was such that four years later he asked Americans the same question. In 1984 he carried 49 out of 50 states plus DC. It was the most resounding affirmation of a political agenda in history. Why? BECAUSE IT WORKED! His program of tax cuts actually doubled revenues to the treasury. (see here, here, and here for information about tax cuts and the Laffer Curve). His smaller government approach turned our country around in ways no one could have expected. When Obama said that he couldn’t fix the country in 4 years, I just look at Reagan and see someone who DID fix it in four years, and did so without blaming his predecessor.

By the end of his last year in office, inflation was reduced to 4.1%. Interest rates fell to 4%. Gross Domestic Product went from a negative to an average growth of 3.05% with some quarters growing at 4% or more. It was the longest peacetime economic expansion in history. Unemployment dropped to 5.4% and 20 million new jobs were created. Families whose income was less than $10,000 went from 8.8% to 8.3% (so those who say the poor got poorer during Reagan are lying their butts off). Families making over $75,000 grew from 20.2% to 25.7% as new small businesses were formed. Poverty dropped by 3% and the median (not to be confused with average) family income increased by $4,000.

On the foreign policy front, the American hostages in Iran were released shortly after his inauguration. American military strength was once again respected in the world. Reagan was accused by many before his election as being a “cowboy”, but he actually used the military quite sparingly. His peace through strength philosophy brought the Soviet Union to the negotiating table and was the first President EVER to negotiate an arms REDUCTION treaty with the Russians. Because of the foundations laid by Reagan during his eight years in office, it wasn’t long before the Soviet Block collapsed and the Cold War was over. The United States had won, thanks to Reagan’s leadership.

In 1986 when I turned 18 and was old enough to vote, it was a no brainer. I eagerly and happily registered as a Republican.

Reagan was a great example of what a President should be. He was firm in his resolve, yet polite in his demeanor. He stood for his principles against the Democrats, but always treated them politely. Of course he took the occasional jab at them, but did so with a sense of humor. He and Democrat Speaker of the House Tip O’Neil met regularly and had a genuine friendship, though the opposed each other politically. Reagan respected the office of the President, and carried himself with an awareness of the office he held.

Reagan also appealed to American’s hopes and dreams, not their prejudices and fears. He told us:

“There are no great limits to human growth because there are no limits of human intelligence, imagination, and wonder.”

“There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect.”

Reagan helped us to see American as the shining city on a hill, a beacon of hope and freedom for the rest of the world. The days of malaise were over and America truly WAS great again. But he also warned us that freedom must be fought for in every generation. “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it on to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and hand on for them to do the same.” Truer words were never spoken.

Since my first election where I was eligible to vote in 1988, I have been a loyal Republican. I have supported the Republican candidates over the Democrats in every election. Even though some of the candidates were not my first choice, I saw them as at least acceptable alternatives to the Democrats. I was thrilled to see Newt Gingrich and the Republicans win control of Congress in 1994 for the first time in 40 years. I was enthusiastic about the Contract with America and the promises it contained. I also saw the political climate get more nasty and bitter. From my observations, most of it came from the left, but the nation became more polarized. It became more Red vs. Blue than trying to do what was right for the country.

Both George HW Bush and George W Bush disappointed me, but I still believe that their performance was better than what Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, and John Kerry would have been. I have seen what a disaster Obama has been and know that John McCain and Mitt Romney would have been better than the current administration, as imperfect as those candidates were.

But now enter Donald Trump. For the first time in my life, I can not support the Republican candidate for President. For the first time I can not tell which would be worse, Trump or Hillary. It is a true Sophie’s Choice. Either way we lose.

I joined the #NeverTrump movement and I must echo their sentiments. There were 16 other candidates running for the Republican nomination that I could have supported and unified under. Any one of them could have unified the party. Some would have a more difficult time than others, but all 16 of them would have unified the party. Only one candidate could not. That candidate was Donald Trump. We warned them that if Trump was nominated that we would NEVER vote for him. In fact, his own supporters said that if Trump wasn’t the nominee that THEY would walk away. Now they want us to support their candidate as if our vote is owed to them. It was the Trump supporters that foisted an unacceptable candidate on the Republican Party. It is their own fault if Trump loses, not the fault of those who warned that we would not support him. They did this over our own objections. They made their own bed. Now they must deal with the consequences and take responsibility for their own actions. We have waited 30 years for the GOP to nominate a constitutional conservative. The Democrats are nominating their weakest candidate in history and this was the year we could actually remind Americans through debate and policy that conservatism actually works. Instead the GOP in its anger blew its load on a pathological, narcissistic, sociopath.

The reasons I can not support Trump are many.

First there is the issue of temperament. The President of the United States must carry himself (or herself) with the decorum and dignity befitting the office. He is the representative of the United States to the rest of the world. He is also one who must work with the Congress to pass helpful legislation and/or prevent harmful legislation. Trump has advanced himself politically on the basis of personal insults. He did not go after his opponents on the basis of issues. When he was embarrassed on the Hugh Hewitt radio show by demonstrating his ignorance of foreign policy he blamed the host for giving him “gotcha” questions. That quickly was dispelled when Carly Fiorina answered the same questions with precision and clear knowledge of the issues, despite not being prepared for the interview. Trump’s response was to insult Ms Fiorina’s face. When a super PAC (NOT the Cruz campaign) created an internet meme calling into question Melania Trump’s modeling career, Trump could have taken the high road. He could have said something along the lines of, “My wife had a wonderful career as a professional model. She posed for a well respected men’s fashion magazine that is read by millions. I am very proud of my wife and her work. She is a beautiful woman and will make a wonderful first lady.” Instead, Trump tweeted out that he would “spill the beans” on Heidi Cruz and later posted some unflattering pictures of the candidate’s wife. When confronted about this in an interview in Wisconsin, he simply said. “He started it.” The interviewer correctly pointed out to Mr. Trump, “That is the argument of a five year old.”

Trump did not stop there. He used The National Enquirer to further go after Cruz, falsely accusing him of having multiple affairs. This is coming from a man who admits that he frequently cheated on his own wives and is currently on his third marriage. Not only that, but also accused Sen/ Cruz’s father of being complicit in the JFK assassination, again based upon a story in the National Enquirer. This is not Trump’s only foray into conspiracy theories. He was a strong proponent of the birther controversy, suggesting that President Obama was not an American. He went to that same well against Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio. He also accused President George W Bush of being in on the 9/11 attacks. Trump acts more like the tinfoil behatted rather than a President of the United States.

Trump also has misled the American people on the nominating process for the Republican Party in an effort to demonize his opponent. The rules clearly state that the nominee of the party must have a MAJORITY of delegates, not a plurality. Just because one has the most delegates does not mean one should automatically be the nominee. The fact that one does not have the majority (1237) indicates that the majority did not support you. Delegates are awarded by primary, caucus, or state convention. In every instance, the voters of the states had the opportunity to make their voices heard. Trump never complained when party rules favored him, such as earning ALL of the delegates of South Carolina when he only won 30^ of the vote there. Cruz understood the rules and competed for delegates wherever he could. There is nothing underhanded about that. Reports that Cruz was winning over Trump delegates failed to consider the process. Of course, those delegates would vote for Trump on the first ballot, but in order for the there to be a nominee, there needs to be a MAJORITY vote. If a majority does not materialize on the first ballot, it would of course be necessary for some delegates to change their votes on subsequent ballots in order for there to be a nominee. Cruz merely made his case that he would be the stronger nominee in the general election and would be a better President….that is all. There was nothing dirty, illegal, or underhanded about his efforts. Trump deliberately spun this as “stealing the election” away from him, despite the fact that Trump had yet to win enough delegates to be nominated. He used the ignorance of the American people on the process as another tool to unfairly demonize his opponent.

Character aside, take a look at where Trump has stood on the issues in the past. He supported higher taxes on job creators, including a one time wealth tax. He has supported a single payer health care system. He has supported the abuse of eminent domain to take property from private citizens for personal profit. He has been a part of the problem, giving campaign donations to far left progressives like Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton, even praising Hillary as someone who would make a good president.

When it comes to limited government, Trump sees the Presidency as a dictatorship. He wants to take unilateral actions that make Obama’s pen and phone seem enlightened in comparison. When asked what the proper role of the federal government is, he suggested that they should be responsible for education and healthcare.

On foreign policy, he seems to think that he and Putin will be best buddies. He has suggested that Japan, South Korea, and Saudi Arabia be given their own nuclear weapons. He has suggested using torture on prisoners, and going after families. This is the approach of a mafia godfather, not a President.

Trump is no conservative.. His conversion to conservative rhetoric is quite convenient. He has been a progressive his whole life and then suddenly becomes a conservative when he decides to run for President? He has no credibility. He has spent his entire life telling people what they want to hear. I simply do not trust that he means what he says. In fact, he has already backtracked on everything he said in the primaries by stating that his promises where merely “suggestions”.

The very things that attracted me to the Republican Party are sadly lacking in Donald Trump. Limited government? Nope. Constitutional restraints on the Presidency? Nope.  Free market economics? Nope. Lower taxes? Nope. Appealing to our hopes and dreams rather than our fears? Nope. Trump fails as a Republican all around.

I will not vote for Donald Trump. It saddens me that I can not support the GOP for the first time in my life. I will vote my conscience and simply let God sort out who is the true lesser of two evils….or the evil of two lessers.